Our barrier object series continues with expanded verb structures. These come in a variety of forms.
A Rundown of Verb Features
In the simplest of sentences, the verb expresses only Tense, past or present.
- John keeps a book on his nightstand; he reads before bedtime.
- Mary celebrated her birthday all month long, and she partied hard.
- Sam likes potatoes.
In English, future tense requires addition of a modal, will.
- She will meet you at the restaurant.
The verb structure expands to accommodate this: “meet” loses its inflection and “will” assumes the tense feature.
As more verb features add into the mix, the structure expands further. Auxiliary verbs be and have assist in Aspect and Voice, and auxiliary do assumes the tense feature for negatives, emphatics, and the interrogative Mood.
- John is keeping a book on his nightstand; he has read it before bedtime.
- The book is opened each night.
- Mary did celebrate her birthday all month long. She didn’t party too hard, though.
- Does Sam like potatoes?
Modals (AKA ” discrepancies”) express conditional or hypothetical attitudes towards the words spoken.
- She might meet you at the restaurant. (Or she might not, idk.)
- She can meet you at the restaurant. (Don’t expect to meet her elsewhere, dude.)
- She should meet you at the restaurant. (But who knows whether she actually will.)
Each of these additions causes a subtle shift in meaning for the verb phrase as a whole. Whichever verb—modal, auxiliary, or main—appears at the front of the structure carries that essential Tense feature.
This tense-bearing verb, then, is the most important verb in any sentence, structure-wise. But semantics-wise, the main verb always carries that torch. And the farther apart they are, the more diluted that main verb becomes.
Expanded Verb Structures as Barriers
If a sentence requires additional nuances, these expanded verb structures serve a necessary purpose. However, especially in patterns of deception, extra nuances slip in unnecessarily, and the structure carries more baggage than needed.
Compare the following two sentences:
- John was glaring at Mary.
- John glared at Mary.
Both give the reader the same semantic information, but Sentence #2 is more efficient about it. Sentence #1 has added a progressive aspect, even though there’s no other event occurring at the same time as John’s glare. The aspect, then, is gratuitous.
A single three-letter word might not be much for a reader to gloss over, but when it becomes a pattern of usage, that gloss becomes a game of leapfrog. This goes for extra modals as well as auxiliaries. Any string of function words beyond the main verb (the semantic powerhouse) merits scrutiny.
- Mary frowned at this disclosure, any retort she might have made having been stifled.
Here we have 6 (six!) verbs in a row. They are two separate verb phrases, (she) might have made and having been stifled, both of which modify “retort.” Only the past participle stifled carries distinct concrete meaning, while everything else adds nuance.
And we can reduce the whole ungainly string into a single modifier and that past participle:
- Mary frowned, her possible retorts stifled at this disclosure.
This revision gives the exact same semantic information to the reader, but without so much structure to stumble through.
In addition to unnecessary verb features, this barrier object occurs in a crop of semantically weak verbs. These are verbs that combine with other verbs or else with nouns that point to an event to create their overall meaning. For example:
- find oneself [verb]-ing, begin [verb]-ing, start [verb]-ing, continue [verb]-ing
- tend to [verb], want to [verb], like to [verb], need to [verb]
- make a(n) X [where X = the noun form of a verb]
- E.g., make a decision, make a reply, make an escape, make a choice
- take a(n) X [where X = the noun form of a verb]
- E.g., take a step, take a seat, take a shower, take a bite
An expanded verb of this ilk has inefficiency built into its structure.
Participles to Main Verbs
The [verb]-ing participles of the first bullet are where we find the more important semantics of the phrase. The reflexive nature of find oneself [verb]-ing creates distance between the subject and the action, as though a character isn’t wholly in control of themselves.
In the case of begin, start, and continue, unless the action gets interrupted, there’s no need to specify that it begins or continues, because that’s already implied in context. Compare,
- He began shouting at the crowd.
- He shouted at the crowd.
Both say the same thing, but the second is more direct. However, if we add an interruption, the “began [verb]-ing” structure becomes justified.
- He began shouting at the crowd, but his wife clamped her hand across his mouth.
Aspects happen in concordance with another event. On their own, they become expendable.
As with strings of modals and auxiliaries, weak verbs that take infinitives as their complements can stack up like a conga line.
- My boss tends to want to get to work early.
Add in any aspects or moods, and this could easily spiral out of control.
(But confession: I’ve made a game out of stringing lots of verbs together in a plausible sentence. So far my longest string is nine: “She might have been being coerced to pretend to try to like to dance.” Once you hit the main verb, it’s over, haha.)
In these cases, outright revision is the best bet to eliminate the string, unless you really, truly need it.
- My boss comes to work early if she can.
It’s not semantically exact, but it’s close enough that the same sense remains.
Of particular note in our above list of weak verb examples, make and take fall into the category of light verbs, along with do, have, and give. If you look them up in the dictionary, their entries can span over multiple pages, because their meanings have diluted to a bland meh that requires modifiers. They are the unseasoned starches of the language.
And why would we purposefully use them? In many cases, these expanded verb structures have no different meaning than their simpler counterparts. If you make a decision, you decide; similarly, to make an escape = to escape, to take a seat = to sit, to take a bite = to bite, and so forth.
The primary difference lies in structure, not in semantics. Weak verb phrases say very little in a lot of words. Revising for more precise language simplifies these structures, which allows the reader to access the story without wading through that slew of extra verbiage.
The Litmus Test
When evaluating verb phrases, consider the following two questions:
- Does my tense-bearing verb communicate the main action of the sentence?
- If not, is there a good reason why?
Don’t bog down the reader with too much structure. Our brains actively look for the verb in the sentence, so keep it efficient.
Tl;dr, simple tenses are better; save the expanded verb structures for when they’re necessary.
Up next: Hedges and Qualifiers
Previous: Filter Verbs
Back to Liar, Liar Navigation Page